Wednesday, September 22, 2021

Court upholds suspension of Trump’s travel ban

An undated handout photo made available by the US National Parks Service (NPS) showing the Registry Room on Ellis Island, in Upper New York Bay, New York, USA, as immigrants await the legal inspection trying to make it into America. Reports state on 09 February 2017 that the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, in San Francisco, California, is considering arguments over lifting a temporary halt to President Donald Trump’s controversial travel ban, from seven predominantly Muslim countries, where a decision will be reached this week. EFE

Washington, Feb 9 (EFE).- Federal appellate judges on Thursday upheld an injunction issued by a lower court blocking President Donald Trump’s executive order temporarily barring residents of seven mainly Muslim countries from entering the United States.

A three-judge panel of the US 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco rejected the Trump administration’s motion to reinstate the Jan. 27 executive order.

Trump’s order mandated a temporary pause in admission of refugees, a 90-day prohibition on entry by residents of Iraq, Syria, Sudan, Iran, Somalia, Libya, and Yemen, and an indefinite suspension of admission of Syrian refugees.

The appellate judges concluded that the order should remain in abeyance pending a final court ruling on its legality.

The president immediately took to Twitter to announce his intention to appeal Thursday’s decision.

“SEE YOU IN COURT, THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!,” Trump tweeted on his personal account.

The administration can ask for a review of the panel’s decision by the full 9th Circuit, or it can seek intervention by the US Supreme Court, which is still one short of its normal complement of nine members, creating the possibility of a 4-4 deadlock.

An undated handout photo made available by the US National Parks Service (NPS) showing immigrant inspection in Great Hall, Ellis Island, in Upper New York Bay, New York, USA, as immigrants await the legal inspection trying to make it into America. Reports state on 09 February 2017 that the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, in San Francisco, California, is considering arguments over lifting a temporary halt to President Donald Trump’s controversial travel ban, from seven predominantly Muslim countries, where a decision will be reached this week. EPA/NPS HANDOUT MANDATRY CREDIT: NPS HANDOUT EDITORIAL USE ONLY/NO SALES

A tie in the Supreme Court would allow the appellate ruling to stand.

The 9th Circuit panel declined to overturn the restraining order issued last Friday by a federal district judge in Seattle, James Robart, acting on a motion from the attorney general of Washington state.

Judges Michelle T. Friedland, William C. Canby Jr., and Richard R. Clifton said the Trump administration failed to demonstrate that suspension of the executive order posed a threat to national security.

The administration says that the executive order was meant to provide time to develop a procedure for “extreme vetting” of Muslims seeking to enter the United States, something Trump proposed during the presidential campaign after his initial call for an outright Muslim ban drew criticism from across the political spectrum.

Roughly 1,000 State Department career employees have signed a memo denouncing the executive order.

The Cato Institute, a libertarian think-tank in Washington, has pointed out that since at least 1975, no terrorist attacks have been carried out on US soil by nationals of the seven nations affected by the visa suspension.